Home Politics Court hearing revives legal battle against Trump’s Venezuelan deportation

Court hearing revives legal battle against Trump’s Venezuelan deportation

8
0

NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!

U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg Donald TrumpSecond term – Laid the foundation for another fierce court battle.

Boasberg did not immediately issue a motion he would consider at the hearing.

But this comes after Boasberg finds himself at the center of Trump’s anger and attacks this year’s so-called “activist” judge after his temporary restraining order on March 15 attempting to stop Trump’s use of the Alien Enemy Act – Wartime Immigration Act of 1798 – Rapid – Rapid Exit hundreds of Venezuelan nationals Earlier this year, I went to El Salvador.

Boasberg also ordered all bound aircraft to return El Salvador to the United States “immediately”, which did not happen.

His emergency orders involved a complex legal legend that ultimately raised the challenges of dozens of federal courts across the country – despite the challenges of his court filed on March 15 – which later prompted the Supreme Court to rule in two different situations, in violation of the due process protection of immigrants. The United States Constitution.

As a result, Boasberg has become a person at the center of legal radiation.

While the order itself has some holding pattern – the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia retained the order two months ago, and they agreed to review the ruling – a hearing on Thursday could cheer up again.

Who is U.S. Judge James Boasberg at the center of Trump’s deportation efforts?

James E. Boasberg, Chief Justice of the Federal District Court of Washington, DC. (Washington Post, by Getty)

Boasberg is expected to consider the plaintiff’s motion to reopen limited discovery and cited new evidence, including a recent report that the U.S. holds sole legal liability and custody for immigrants transferred to CECOT, according to El Salvador officials. Other submissions include a whistleblower report by former Justice Department attorney Erez Reuveni, who worked in the case shortly before his removal.

Trump administration officials have repeatedly served as “radical judges” (Boasberg) as “radical judges” (Boasberg), the term they hired for judges who suspend or block Trump’s comprehensive policy priorities through executive orders. Trump himself has raised the idea that there could be an improper moment earlier this year prompting Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare public warning.

Trump administration calls for Supreme Court to review El Salvador’s deportation case

U.S. President Donald Trump and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi (L) arrive at Washington, D.C. Department of Justice (via Getty's Roberto Schmidt/AFP)

President Donald Trump and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi arrive at Washington, D.C. Department of Justice (Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty) speak (Getty Image)

Tensions between Boasberg and the Trump administration soared earlier this year, Boasberg said in April that he found possible reasons to put the Trump administration in criminal conspicuousness because he failed to return the plane to U.S. land under his emergency order, and said the court determined that the Trump administration showed “deliberate disregard” of his order. (The Trump administration appeals the findings to the U.S. Court of Appeal.)

In June, Boasberg ordered Trump administration To provide all non-citizens expelled from the United States to the highest security prison in El Salvador, there is an opportunity to seek habeas aid in court and question their so-called gang identity.

Click here to get the Fox News app

His 69-page order first invokes Franz Kafka’s “Judgement”, the protagonist Josef K.

“That’s what Frengel Reyes Mota, Andry Jose Hernandez Romero, and dozens of Venezuelan non-citizens said they were in trouble on March 15, 2025,” Boasberg said.

Thursday’s hearing was a series of new reports and charges filed by the plaintiff in the case to reopen the discovery.

Source link