Supreme Court Justice failed to sign an affidavit in leak investigation

Every Supreme Court employee Leaked draft abortion decision Before the formal announcement, an affidavit of sworn in was signed, promising that they would not be released after the disclosure.

Except for nine judges, every employee can do it.

On Friday, the day after the Marshal’s Office of the Top U.S. Court released a report that said its investigators were already on Friday. Unable to identify the culprit Behind the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization Arrive in Politico in May.

“I talked with each judge many times during the investigation,” Marshal Gail Cooley statement Released by the court on Friday. “The Justice actively collaborated in this iteration, asked questions and answered mine. I followed up with all the reliable prospects, and it didn’t involve the judge or their spouse.

“On this basis, I don’t think it’s necessary to ask the Supreme Court to sign the oath of office,” Cooley said.

The marshal said in a report released Thursday that 126 interviews had been conducted with 97 court employees as part of the search for leakers. “The focus of the investigation is on court personnel – temporary (law firms) and permanent employees who have or may have had or may have obtained draft opinions,” the marshal said.

At the end of the initial interview, each employee was asked to sign an affidavit under perjury so that they would not be behind the leak. “If the investigators later determine any person who lied to the investigators, those personnel will be subject to false statements prosecuted,” the marshal wrote.