Home World Does James Bond have to be played by men? Helen Mirren seems...

Does James Bond have to be played by men? Helen Mirren seems to think so | Zoe Williams

3
0

‘I“A feminist like this” Helen Mirren Tell Saga magazine, but women can’t do the job. To be exact: “You can’t have a woman [as James Bond]. It just doesn’t work. James Bond must be James Bond or it will be something else. ”

Mirren is starring opposite Pierce Brosnan in the film adaptation of Richard Osman’s The Thursday Murder Club, in which they both play amateur sleuths in a care home. Brosnan may also describe himself as “a feminist like this” – he has never said so explicitly, but in 2019 he said women’s bonds would be “exciting.” But, now he returns to the team and says, “I’m so happy to see the next man coming to the stage and see the new thrills and life of this character.” Exciting, exciting, thrilling: I don’t think I’ve ever seen any bonds from all the qualities I’ve never seen before, from Connery to Craig’s great male range. But who should I judge? Whenever 007 gets a new pen that can poison someone from 50 steps, his venous stimulation may suggest a slight reduction in his stern appearance. Indeed, masculinity is an unknown boundary.

A few things, and then we hand over the franchise to Amazon, bought it earlier this year for over $100 million. The basic qualities of a bond are as follows: He can kill commanders without a conscience unless he has a conscience; he is patriotic; he is irresistible to women. He favors tailored monochrome clothes. He can drink neat spirits without intoxication. And he always introduces himself in the opposite order, those who tend to already know their names. If you understand alleged nationalism as patriarchal rhetoric, then it is not a “man” except patriotism. That being said, women can serve patriarchy like men – look at Mirren. Sorry, this is totally none: at least she cannot be revoked based on her bond opinion, as this will pass too much power in the gender field of 007.

On another point: Is Bond a feminist? This is a tricky one. From his early days of “lovely chauvinist” to the “painful Quester” after his “self-truth” iteration, his value system has changed a lot, and fewer than myself may think that he has been a boring analysis since he first wore a meal jacket in 1962. James Bond As a representative of the ever-changing social expectations of men, we must conclude that as long as they are ready to take out a secondary dictator with the Piano Wire and ignore due process.

Arguably, given the semi-history of tech companies, Amazon’s takeover is more important to franchise, which invented the AI recruitment tool in 2018 Train yourself effectively and prefer male candidates;exist Alexa doesn’t know what a lioness is;And, according to the staff, it has The Office Culture You Never Workedwhich will automatically exclude sane people – come on, many of them will be women. It sounds like a pair of safe hands to take over the management of a fictional character, and we hope his arc will continue to bend towards gender justice? Not so, but at the same time, it would be very annoying if Amazon does create a feminine bond in the world and uses it as a feminist wash and permanently proven that no intentionally created any sexist algorithm.

No one overreacted, but for sure, what was crying in history was a gender fluid bond.

Zoe Williams is a guardian columnist

Do you have any comments on the questions raised in this article? If you want to submit a reply of up to 300 words by email to our letter Please partition Click here.

Source link