U.S. Attorney General Orders Grand Jury Hearing on Trump-Russian Investigation

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered prosecutors to open up legal proceedings to accuse Donald Trump of his long-time claiming that he was smearing his so-called Russian plot to smear him.

Bundy has ordered federal prosecutors to seek potential prosecution, according to CBS News, a U.S. partner of the BBC.

However, it is not clear how much the possible allegations may be and who may be charged.

Last month, NIA Director Tulsi Gabbard Decrypted report That Democrat called it a mistake.

Gabbard claims that Obama White House politicized intelligence on Russian intervention in the 2016 White House election to compare Trump with Russia. Trump responded by accusing Obama of “treason.”

An Obama spokesman later called the allegation “weird.”

Democrats say nothing in Gabbard’s discovery January 2017 Assessment Russia has concluded that it is trying to damage Clinton’s campaign and promote Trump in a vote three months ago.

2020 Bipartisan Report The Senate Intelligence Committee also found Russia was trying to help Trump’s 2016 campaign.

But last month, the head of national intelligence referred the matter to the Justice Department to consider possible charges.

Bondy referred the referral on Monday by directing an unnamed federal prosecutor to provide evidence to the grand jury, according to CBS.

The grand jury is a group of publics who determine whether there is enough evidence to prosecute in the case.

It is unclear which former official might be the target of any grand jury activity.

But Fox News reported last month that former CIA director John Brennan and former FBI director James Comey are undergoing a criminal investigation related to the Trump-Russian investigation. Both have long denied any misconduct and accused Trump of subverting the judicial system.

Half of Trump’s first president was covered up by his own Justice Department investigation whether he had swung his 2016 results with Russia.

The resulting Mueller report did not find Trump or his campaign coordinated with the Kremlin, nor was anyone charged with such a crime.

The debate over the Russian Gate was revived last week when another Justice Department investigation into the incident was explained.

Page 29 Special counsel John Durham’s inquiry cited a memo from US intelligence sources in March 2016, saying that Democratic White House candidate Hillary Clinton approved a plan to smear Trump as a Russian asset.

Durham cites “the seemingly or allegedly original emails of hackers related to Russian intelligence”, possibly obtained from an employee of a nonprofit run by Liberal donor George Soros.

One of the messages appears to be sent by Leonard Benardo, senior vice president of the Open Society Foundation, charity Soros. Apparently referring to Clinton’s foreign policy adviser Julianna Smith.

“Julie said it would be a long-term event that demonized Putin and Trump. Now, this is good for a post-investment rebound. Later, the FBI will put more oil into practice.”

There is nothing illegal about the political smear, but Trump’s allies suggest that the email, if true, suggests that federal investigators could have been part of the plan. However, Durham found no evidence of such FBI conspiracy.

According to the appendix, Benardo told Durham, “In his memories, he did not draft the email, although he pointed out that some of the erotic further words sounded like he could have said.

The special counsel also interviewed Smith, who said she did not remember receiving an email from Bernardo.

Durham did not determine in his appendix whether the emails were real or whether the Russian spy tampered with it.

Durham’s main 306-page report, published in 2023, found that the FBI’s original investigation into the Trump campaign lacked “analytical rigor” and relied on “primitive, united and unrepaired intelligence.”

U.S. officials found that Russian intervention in 2016 included hacking on robot farms and Democratic emails, but they eventually concluded that the impact could be limited and did not actually change the election results.