Durham disclosure further undermines Gabbard’s conspiracy claims against Trump | Trump administration

Tulsi GabbardDirectors of National Intelligence hope to find evidence that Barack Obama and his national security team conspired to undermine Donald Trump in a slow-motion coup.

But, if The purpose of her crusades is to prove Obama began a “treason plot” to falsely show that Russia stepped in to help Trump in the 2016 presidential election, and Gabbard made a mistake. one Accessories from previous categories In another special adviser’s report, John Durham was named Trump’s first president, further undermining Gabbard’s case.

From the beginning, it was a weird business.

After all, Robert Mueller’s 2019 report, the original special counsel was appointed to investigate Russia The allegations and bipartisan five volumes reported in the second year the Senate Intelligence Committee (then chaired by Trump Secretary of State Marco Rubio) – both confirmed the January 2017 intelligence community assessment that expressed “high confidence” in Russia’s intervention.

Russian President Vladimir Putin seemed to have verified the intelligence premise in 2018, when he stood next to Trump at a press conference in Helsinki, admitting he wanted him to win.

A new uncategorized 29-page document from Durham was released this week, containing Gabbard’s abbreviated conclusions. It confirmed that Russian spies were emailed by cyber hackers in Russia’s internal democratic information channels, which Trump supporters believe is a sign of the campaign of his 2016 rival Hillary Clinton, conspiring to accuse him of companionship with Moscow.

“The office’s best assessment is that Benardo’s July 25 and July 27 emails were ultimately a combination of several emails obtained through Russian intelligence hackers to attack U.S. IQ,” Durham wrote. He refers to Leonard Benardo of the Open Society Foundation, which was funded by philanthropist George Soros, Bete Noire of Trump Magazine Base.

One of the alleged emails from Bernardo proposed a plan to “demonize Putin and Trump”, adding: “Later, the FBI will pay more oil to the fire.”

The information and others, including Clinton’s foreign policy aide, Julianne Smith, became part of what is called “Clinton Project Intelligence.” Benardo and Smith raised the controversy that once wrote such emails.

Durham, in his 2023 report released Thursday in a serious edit, insisted at least Benardo’s rejection – concluding that it has been pieced together from other people’s emails to produce something more guilty than reality.

For Gabbard’s crazily attempt to prove the existence of a “deep state” determined to undermine Trump, the email suspected of being bound by Russia is not a brilliant look in her proof pack.

Some former intelligence insiders found that it was no surprise – to see the idea as a Trump-inspired novel. “Trump is lying when he talks about ‘deep state’,” said Fulton Armstrong, an analyst at the CIA who serves in the Democratic and Republican administrations. “But if there was one, it wouldn’t be a Democrat. The culture of this world is deep Republican.”

The National Intelligence Director – who never served in the intelligence department and never served on the House of Representatives’ congressional committee on the same name – would likely think that Durham’s discovery was irrelevant to her pursuit of “making” intelligence by Obama officials.

But Gabbard’s persistence – echoing the boss’s point of view – the plot about torpedo Trump was dismissed Friday by Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan Tell the New Yorker Obama’s instructions indicate that intelligence indicates that Russian intervention should be at least until voting day to ensure fair elections.

“He knows us very well [that] He hopes we try to discover everything the Russians do, but don’t do anything that will interfere with the election. ” Brennan said.

Gabbard listed a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, endorsed by Republican members only – questioning Putin’s claim that he wants to win Trump.

However, now in her crosshairs, Michael Van Landingham, one of the CIA authors of the 2017 Intelligence Assessment, said reliable intelligence exerted the motivations of Russian leaders with clear light.

“The main evidence for getting Putin’s mentality is a secret source, essentially when Putin realized that Clinton would win the election, he ordered influence on Hillary Clinton,” he said. Van Landingham tells PBS News Time.

“We then saw a series of events happening in materials that were hacked by special Russian services or intelligence services to leak these materials, similar to information provided by secret sources. Meanwhile, we saw many members of the Russian media Donald Trump From a more positive point of view.

“There are other information…collected by the U.S. intelligence community… With time, having high-quality secret sources tell you that Putin is counting on Trump’s victory, letting members of the Russian state say that Trump’s view of Russia will be better because his view of Russia does not represent the United States, and all of these things give us a high level of confidence, which gives us a high level of confidence that Trump wants to win.”