Peter Mandelson tells Donald Trump Ditchley Foundation In a speech ahead of Trump’s second Congressional visit this month.
The British ambassador to Washington portrayed Trump as a harbinger of new political power when businesses no longer work on adopted voters.
Much of the speech focused on calling for the establishment of a US-UK Technology Partnership covering AI, quantum computing and rare Earth minerals, as part of a struggle to win over the Chinese competition Lord Mandelson will shape this century.
He said this partnership with the United States has the potential to be as important as the security relationship that the United States and Britain had established in World War II, adding: “If China wins the competition for technological advantages over the next few decades, every aspect of our lives will be affected.”
The first step of the partnership is likely to unveil during Trump’s state visit, including a new commitment to cheap nuclear energy powering the AI revolution.
Mandelson, though fiercely pro-European, also said that Brexit did not make Britain relevant to the United States, but made Britain a more attractive website for American investors by lifting it off the burden of European regulation.
Mandelson’s critics of Trump’s interpretation of populism will argue that its shared values vanish between Trump’s Maga movement and European liberal democracies.
In his game to build a close alliance, he did not mention key points including Gaza, the international rule of law, Trump’s inability to see Vladimir Putin stagnant in Ukraine or Trump’s spread of domestic authoritarianism.
He insisted that he did not serve as Trump’s “summary interpreter” and denied the need to work with the Trump team, so he praised the U.S. president for identifying anxiety that deprived millions of impatient voters of meaningful work.
He accused those who strive to stay away from Trump’s U.S. hub for “lazy thinking”, believing that the U.S.’s first creed in the climate crisis, U.S. aid cuts and trade did not rule out tight partnerships.
“The president may not follow a traditional rulebook or traditional practice, but in a world he is an adventurer in a world where the “as usual” approach is no longer effective.
“Indeed, at home and abroad, he seems to have a tec stomach for political risks—convening other countries and intervening in the conflict that other presidents would think endlessly before decreasing analytical paralysis and progressive incrementalism.
“However – this is not well understood – although Trump’s national security strategy is called ‘U.S. first’, it does not actually mean ‘U.S.’.
After the newsletter promotion
“We saw him using the weight of the United States to put the right people in the room and hammer the compromise to grind off the concessions.
“I’m not only thinking about Ukraine, the president has put in new energy to end Putin’s brutal invasion and brings peace to the region. If the president is so indifferent to the rest of the world, if he fell in love with the United States alone, he wouldn’t have stepped in multiple conflicts in the past seven months.
“In addition, the ‘International Order’ people claim he’s interrupted and his allegedly broken calm is already at a breakpoint. So, I think Trump has more reasons than the turmoil we are experiencing.”
He continued: “He won’t always put everything right, but with his sharp pen and the free-to-play Oval Office media spray, he sounds deafening to the call of the international old defender.
“From the U.S. perspective, the president is right about the status quo that fails. The whole world depends on the willingness of the U.S. to be a sheriff, and in any mistake, in any world where American allies can fall behind – not always so behind – and then let the U.S. allow most of the heavy lifting.”
He further praised Trump’s military attack on Iran than the official British route, saying: “Trump understands the positively compulsive forces of the traditional American deterrence, blocking opponents by integrating power and strategic unpredictability, as we see with Iran’s decisive action on Iran’s nuclear program. These strikes go beyond their military influence, and these strikes have caused these men to impose an all-in-one alienation in exchange for the speech of a group of people who think that the one has given some thoughts.
Health & Wellness Contributor
A wellness enthusiast and certified nutrition advisor, Meera covers everything from healthy living tips to medical breakthroughs. Her articles aim to inform and inspire readers to live better every day.
