Burner cell phone, wipe society: Trump’s extreme precautions for American tourists | Trump administration

kEith Serry Settings Bring Shows to New York CityThis year’s Edge Festival, but it’s been inserted for a few weeks. After 35 years in the trip to the United States, he said he no longer felt safe.

“We are evaluating the perspective of entering a country, at least until recently, that’s allegedly an example of democracy. Yes, these are things that make me very uncomfortable.” Canadian Performers and lawyers.

“You don’t think you want to leave evidence of ‘bad opinions’ to your people.”

Serry is a large number of foreign nationals who reconsider traveling to the United States Trump administrationAfter arriving after encountering reports about visitors facing rigorous scrutiny and detention.

In March, a French scientist who criticized Donald Trump was Refuse to enter After searching his phone, go to the United States. Australian writer was detained and denied entry in June explain Initially, he grilled articles on his Pro-Palestinian protests, and then watched the border agent even investigated the most personal images on his phone. He was told that the search found evidence of past drug use, and he has not yet admitted in his visa exemption application that he refused. Germany, Britain and other European tourists were also detained and sent home.

More than a dozen countries have updated their travel guides to the United States. In Australia and Canada, government consultations were changed to specifically mention the potential of electronic device searches.

exist suggestion Among all kinds of experts, people are locking in social media, deleting photos and private information, eliminating facial recognition, and even traveling with a “burner” phone to protect themselves.

In Canada, multiple public agencies urge employees to avoid traveling to the United States, at least one It is said that Tell employees to keep their usual equipment at home and bring in a second device while having limited personal information.

“Everyone feels introverted, but they don’t know exactly that they are guilty,” said Heather Segal, founding partner of Segal immigration law in Toronto, who described the influx of concerns she heard.

“‘Did I do something wrong? Do I have anything? Will what I say become a problem?”

She advises travelers to assess their risky appetite by reviewing private data stored on their devices and any information they have public access and considering what to do.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has extensive powers to search for equipment with minimal reason. Travelers can refuse to comply, but non-citizens may be denied entry. CBP data It shows that such searches are rare; over 47,000 devices checked their devices last year among the 420 million international travelers. Despite more reports on these encounters, the numbers have not increased significantly this year.

“It’s interesting that these searches seem to be increasing, and I think it’s true, and I don’t doubt I think they’re more targeted than before,” said Tom McBrien, an attorney for the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

“It seems they are targeting people that people usually don’t like politically.”

Travelers who care about privacy should consider minimizing the amount of data they carry, McBrien said.

“The less data you have about yourself, the less searches you will be, and the less data you collect,” he said. In addition to using auxiliary devices, he recommends firmly deleting the data, moving it to a hard drive or storing it in a password-protected cloud account.

A spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rejected the claim that CBP is strengthening device searches under the new government or picking out travelers with its political views.

“These searches are conducted to detect digital contraband, terrorism-related content and information related to visitor acceptability, all of which play a crucial role in national security,” a spokesperson told the Guardian in a statement.

“Accusing political beliefs of triggering inspections or dismissals is groundless.”

However, the statement acknowledged that under Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the review was reviewed.

“Under the Trump administration and Secretary Norm, we have the safest borders in U.S. history,” it said. “This allows the CBP to focus on actual censorship and interviews of people trying to enter our country.”

Australian writer Alistair Kitchen, who was denied entry into the U.S. in June, said the Department of Homeland Security’s denial of political goals directly contradicted what he said when he arrived.

Border officials “actively brag about my targeted reason, because my detention path is clearly because of what I wrote online about the Columbia University protests.”

The kitchen said that while he does not intend to return to the United States under the Trump administration, if he ever did, he would either not call or bring a burner.

“Under any conditions, I will not hand over the password to that phone,” he added. “I will accept deportation immediately, rather than handing over the password. People should think seriously before booking a trip, especially if they are journalists, writers or activists.”

Various foreign nationals told the Guardian that they are rethinking travel plans for travel, family visits, academic activities and work.

Donald Rothwell, a professor who teaches international law at the Australian National University, said he no longer plans to accept invitations to the United States, fearing detention or rejection of entry – which, he noted, could also trigger red flags on his future trip.

He even thinks there is no equipment to travel at all, but his academic comments in the media can be ignored by him anyway.

“I might comment on things that might be criticized by the United States,” he said. “For example, I’m very critical of the law or lack of legal reasons for our military strike against Iran in June.”

Kate, the Canadian name, whose name was detained for privacy concerns, said she made complicated decisions about whether to visit relatives in the United States across borders, including an upcoming wedding. On a trip earlier this year, she removed the social media app before custom.

Although the Department of Homeland Security assured that travelers were not marked for political beliefs, she said: “It’s hard to believe what the government is saying.”

“It’s great to believe that things like this are real, and the stories you hear are absolutely horrible, but they are isolated events,” she said.

“But I do feel that in many ways, the United States has lost its goodwill.”