Oregon governor rejects Bundy’s request to terminate sanctuary protection

Attorney General Pam Bondi received a reply from the first state governor this week to pass “sanctuary” legislation Federal Immigration Law Enforcement To harm the interests of the United States. ”

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, Democrats confirm receipt Bondy’s original letter Starting last week, I replied to her “respect”.[s]“Bondy’s claim.

“Oregon, its public officials and their law enforcement personnel do not engage in hindering behavior Federal Immigration Law Enforcement,” Kotke said, noting that Beaver passed the first sanctuary law in the United States in 1987.

D-Eugene’s state Rep. Rocky Barilla introduced the bill, which was made by Gov. Neil Goldschmidt Immigration status.

Wu Xiangbangdi in Boston started a revolution when other cities lashed out at the warnings of “sanctuary”.

In response to Bondy, Kotek said that in his nearly 40 years since Oregon officials and law enforcement, he has not violated federal immigration laws when complying with state policies.

“A voting measure to repeal Oregon’s federal immigration enforcement law in 2018 failed when 63% of Oregon voters opposed repealing existing laws,” she said.

Kotek cited Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum’s statement following the 2021 lawsuit:

“Oregon represents the security, dignity and human rights of all Oregonians,” the state prosecutor said at the time. Kotek also responded to the state’s argument within the law, due to the legal precedent of the modern Tenth Amendment, known as “Reign of the Anti-Rule.”

This rule was drawn in 1992 New York v. United States v. United States (US), and the focus was on demands for states to dispose of nuclear waste – stipulating that the federal government cannot force them to manage federal programs.

Trump Administrator Grand Slam ACLU Comparison of Ice Center to Japanese Internment Camps: Lazy and Lazy

President Joe Biden, left; Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, yes (Reuters)

In a letter to Bundy, Kotke said she knew the Trump administration could warn public officials in civil lawsuits on grounds that it hinders federal immigration efforts or promotes violations.

“The state does not bear additional costs or burdens to enforce federal immigration enforcement because it is the job of the federal government,” Kotek continued.

“Oregon complies with federal law and will continue to comply with state law. Therefore, there is no need to advocate immediately to eliminate laws that hinder immigration enforcement,” she concluded.

A federal judge in Oregon is ready to decide on a prominent immigration case in the state and decide whether it is possible to rule, despite being deported before, but has since come back and forth.

Left President Joe Biden and Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek right, enjoy ice cream at a store in 2024. (Reuters)

Foreign nationals were identified as LJPL only and were deported during the Obama administration, and the litigants believed whether he could be released as long as he checked in regularly at the Eugene Immigration Office.

Chief Justice John Roberts also appointed the FISA court, according to the Trump-appointed judge, who will decide whether the ICE can move forward and immediately expel the “LJPL”. Oregon Public Radio.