Legal experts defend Trump’s power to strike Iran without Congress

Members argue about their position as president in the chain of command Donald Trump One expert believes Moors may strike against Iran, and the president, within his constitutional power, robs bombs.

Legislators on both sides of the aisle were involved in a debate about where they were in the order of pecking. Some believe that they should have the only power to authorize strikes, let alone declare war, while others believe that if he wants to join the Israeli bombing campaign against Iran, it is within Trump’s remit.

“Constraint Instinct”: Who declares war when the Senate splits

The main argument on the mountain is that the whole point of supporting Israel is to prevent the Islamic Republic from creating or purchasing nuclear weapons.

However, a legal scholar helped develop a 2001 mandate to use military power that authorized the U.S. armed forces to use the then-President entity George W. Bush It is believed to be behind the terrorist attack in New York City on September 11, 2001, he believes there is a difference between the constitutional power of Congress to declare war and the president’s power to use force abroad.

“I think the position we take is what Trump should take now.” John Yoo Tell Fox News numbers. “As a legal matter, the president does not need Congress to allow foreign participation in hostilities. However, as a political matter, it is very important for the president to go to Congress and show our enemies the front line.”

Thun warned Iran should return to the negotiation form “if they are smart”

Senator Tim Kaine, D-VA. A resolution was submitted requiring debate and vote before any force was imposed on Iran. (Getty Image)

The Constitution separates war powers, between Congress and the White House, giving legislators the only power to declare war, while the president is the commander-in-chief who commands the army. Nearly two centuries later, at the height of the Vietnam War, the war powers of 1973 were born, trying to further define these roles.

Yoo agrees to the Constitution clearly states Congress Having the sole power to declare war, which effectively changed the country’s legal status. However, he retorted: “The makers do not think that language means that the president and Congress are like two weapons officers on a nuclear submarine and must turn the keys at the same time to use force.”

“The founders are very practical people, they know that Congress is slow to act, which is a large body aimed at deliberation, but the president defends the country quickly and decisively.”

Adding fuel to the debate in Washington is a Senate resolution from D-Va. Senator Tim Kaine and the House of Representatives, from R-ky. Representatives Thomas Massie and D-Calif. Ro Khanna. These measures are intended to examine Trump’s powers and reaffirm the constitutional authority of Congress.

‘Another endless conflict’: Democrats echo Trump’s anti-war stance as tensions escalate in the Middle East

President Donald Trump and Rep. Thomas Massie. (Win McNamee/Pool/AFP through Getty Images | Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Yoo said the resolutions appear to be in the form of “political opportunism”, noting that current President Joe Biden wanted to provide aid to Ukraine when former President Barack Obama was engaged abroad or when Trump authorized the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, there was no solution asking Congress for comment.

“People on the mountain confuse the necessary constitutionality with the politically convenient thing,” Yoo said. “Two very different things.”

He said Congress “real power over war is the power of the wallet, which means lawmakers decide whether to fund the Pentagon and the military during the funding process. Republicans are currently working to pass Congress’ “big and beautiful bill” and get into his table before Independence Day.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The huge bill includes about $150 billion in funding Ministry of National Defense.

“If Congress really doesn’t want us and doesn’t want Trump to do that, then he can get involved in the Israel-Iran war deeper,” Yoo said. “All they have to do is fund the military.”

“Ironically, you have someone who voted for the Department of Defense to pay hundreds of billions of dollars, and they then turned around and complained that they didn’t have the ability to vote for war,” he said. “Every time they voted for the funding, the vote made the war possible.”