Republicans want to install the midterm elections. Will they succeed? | Moira Donegan

IfA sign of an authoritarian regime is the meaning of elections, and you can make an argument that the United States has withdrawn from its long-standing form of democratic government. In the 2013 Shelby County ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court destroyed the 1965 Voting Rights Act, imposing a series of restrictions on franchises for states that were previously banned as part of an effort to prevent Jim Crow from re-establishing; in many Republican-controlled states, voting quickly became more arduous and arduous.

Three years ago, in Citizens United, the same court announced that the company’s money was regarded as political speech, thus opening up with political money to allow the rich to distort public discourse before the election. Donald Trump interference The 2020 census, so few of those who are reluctant to support him can create a skewed American vision in the data the government uses to allocate public resources and Congressional representatives. The result is a clear picture of the Republican approach to elections: as long as they create positive results for candidates, there is no need to be strictly expressed by fairness, freedom or meaningful people’s will.

Until mid-2026, Republicans are pursuing this agenda with new enthusiasm. In Trump’s direction, Republicans in Texas want to remake their state’s congressional map to make the Republicans more favorable, allowing the party to choose not by persuading voters but by choosing who voters will be to get more seats in the House. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to continue its efforts to rewrite Republican election law, filed a long-standing case from Louisiana, challenging the rest of the Voting Rights Act, and speeding up the debate so that countries that Republicans tend to tend to tend to tend to tend to re-list their maps in the November 2026 contest.

In Texas, efforts to ensure voters’ actual preferences are not related to the outcome of the House game are shown in dramatic ways. Trump told Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in early August that he had revised his state’s congressional district map — an unusual move in the mid-decade — to ensure that the Republicans won up to five seats in Congress. “We” – Republicans – “right to five seats”, The President says. Trump cited his victory in Texas in the 2024 election, proving that the state’s congressional seat belongs to his party – furthering his claim, often undecisive, but repeatedly asserting that his victory in 2024 constitutes the full and permanent authority granted to all U.S. policy and political jurisdictions.

The governor of Texas quickly called the state legislature to a special meeting to vote on the proposed new 2016 region. In a political theater, a political theater designed to draw attention to the move, then Democrats in the state legislature left Texas to protest to vote for a group that denies the bodies to seek shelter in the Democratic state of Illinois. Confrontation Finish California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that Democrats surrendered and agreed to encourage his state legislators to re-paint Democrats when they return to the state on Friday. The new Texas map could pass by Labor Day, which allows the state to vote once more than a year or more to secure the outcome of its 2026 Congressional game.

This move may become more common in the near future. The Supreme Court, which was dissatisfied with the announcement of most of the voting rights bill in 2013, is now on strike Section 2, which is the last remaining building for the law. The law allows states to map what is called “majority minority” areas so that black voters can express political power in areas where they are focused, rather than diluting their voting preferences by selling their votes to most white areas.

These judges are now ready to defeat the last remaining remains of the 20th-century law that aims to constitute black voting rights in the long history of political repression and ultimately make the 15th Amendment meaningful in practice. Without this law, Republican-controlled countries may remake their maps to eliminate the “major minority” areas, making it nearly impossible for black voters to elect their preferred candidate in many states, especially among former allies.

There is no need for the Supreme Court to take such cases. Questions of the Problem – in Louisiana’s re-division, in a state that has the second most minority of six congressional districts in the state, with more than 30% of its blacks – have been declared constitutional by the Court of Appeal and respected the Supreme Court’s long-standing. But John Roberts – now the moderate court now – has a career hatred against the Voting Rights Act and will not deny the chance to eventually beat it altogether. The court accelerated the debate so that it could be made public in June 2026 – just in time to get the states to re-dividate by the midterm. It’s another signal that the justices in the court majority consider themselves a Republican agent – overall, the Republicans are becoming less interested in their interest in competitive elections.

It remains to be seen whether these efforts will successfully determine Republican support. Perhaps the re-division in Texas and the retaliation of the California program would not prompt picky parties in states across the country; perhaps the Supreme Court would show atypical restraint rather than overturn decades of precedents to further erode the voting rights of black Americans.

But the odds are small, and anyway, the Republican Party has shown that its commitment to democratic elections, the kind they may lose – the paper is thin. this Trump administrationMeanwhile, their first efforts to rewrite census rules are being restored. They hope that in 2030, many Americans in democratic-oriented areas will not count at all.