Supreme Court Regulations on Transgender Treatment Injunction in Tennessee

this Supreme Court Tennessee law prohibits gender transition treatment for adolescents in the state, which is not discriminatory, ruled Wednesday.

In this case, the question in the U.S. v. SKRMETTI case is whether Tennessee Senate Act 1 “prohibits all medical treatments designed to allow the minor to identify or live, or live in a case of gender inconsistent with the minor, or treats “protected “discomfort” or “pain” or “pain” and identified cartisms cartisms cartisms trimestions trabessions trimestions violations “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “violation” of “ ”

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the law discussed was not highly censored by censorship, “because it cannot be classified on any basis that requires enhanced censorship.”

All three liberals opposed it in this case.

The Supreme Court appears to be divided on national ban on gender transition “treatment” for minors

This law prohibits the state from allowing Medical provider Provide pubertal blockers and hormones to promote the transition from minors to another gender.

It also targets healthcare providers in the state, who continue to provide such procedures to minors in the gender community – opening up fines, litigation and other liabilities to these providers.

The court’s ruling, after many other states moved to ban or restrict medical treatment and procedures for transgender adolescents, drew close attention to the case. exist Oral argumentThe Supreme Court Justice seems reluctant to overturn Senate Bill 1, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggesting that the state legislature, not the court, is best equipped to regulate medical procedures.

Roberts said the Constitution “leaved such questions to the deputies of the people, rather than to the nine Supreme Court judges, “no one is a doctor. ”

Supreme Court weighs trans youth treatment in landmark case

The High Court heard oral debates on the case in early December. At that time, after nearly two and a half hours of intense arguments, the judge appeared on the constitutionality of state laws. (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)

Judge Samuel Alito cited “controversial” medical research on the benefits of such medical treatments. He also mentioned other studies from the UK and Sweden that reported negative consequences of adolescents after receiving gender transition treatment.

Alito told government lawyers that the studies “found a complete lack of high-quality evidence that the benefits of related treatments here outweighed the risks.”

“Do you object to this?” Alito asked during the oral debate.

However, Judge Sonia Sotomayor has been linked with evidence against minors against the evidence of being denied treatment.

“Some kids suffer incredible pain from gender irritability, don’t they? I think some suicides?” she said. “The state has come here and is drastically different from the way it normally addresses this problem, it has completely decided to cover the perspectives of parents, patients, doctors, who work hard to address these decisions and try to make these compromises.”

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is the petitioner for the case, representing the parents of three transgender teenagers and a Memphis-based doctor who treats transgender patients.

this Biden gives medicine The petitioner who had previously joined the case through federal law, which allowed the government to intervene in certain cases certified by the Attorney General, which is “the importance of the general public.”

LGBTQ+ advocate, family sued Trump administrator ends trans healthcare funding under 19

Some people on the left call for an end to transgender efforts (Mark Kerrison/image via Getty in the picture)

However, the Trump administration notified the Supreme Court in February that the administration would change its position on the constitutionality of the law, saying Tennessee Law No violation of the equal protection clause.

In addition, it is disputed that the level of review that courts should use to assess the constitutionality of national injunctions for transgender medical treatment for minors such as SB1 and whether these laws are considered to be discriminated by gender or discrimination against the “quasi-advisory class”, and therefore, higher scrutiny is required in the equal protection clause. constitution.

This is another focus of the oral debate in December, as petitioners and respondents fought for more than two hours when the court should review the law on transgender laws involving minors (including SB1).

Tennessee believed at the time that its law could still withstand the test of stricter scrutiny and argued in a court summary that it did have a “convincing interest” to protect the health and safety of minors in the state and “protect the integrity and ethics of the healthcare industry.”

The Supreme Court can take a huge step through historic hearings

President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Feeding Men from Women’s Sports,” a nationwide girl and women on Sports Day. (Getty Image)

The High Court’s ruling was at a time when transgender rights were a controversial topic.

president Donald Trump After being sworn in in January, the problem was broken almost immediately.

Just weeks after the inauguration, Trump signed an executive order to prevent biological men from participating in the women’s sports.

The order signed the “get men out of women’s sports” at the Sports Festival. It bans schools and colleges that receive federal funding and allows Title IX to allow transgender people to identify biology men Women’s Sports Team and access to women’s locker room and bathroom.

Click here to get the Fox News app

If such agencies fail to comply with the order, they may be investigated and lose federal funds.

Trump administration’s policy on trans rights inevitably becomes The goal of legal challenges Initiated by advocacy groups, healthcare organizations and individuals who claim to be discriminatory.

This is a shocking news story. Please check the update.