Home World American Journal of Medicine rejects call for withdrawal of vaccine research from...

American Journal of Medicine rejects call for withdrawal of vaccine research from RFK JR | Robert F Kennedy Jr

2
0

The influential American medical journal rejects the call from the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F Kennedy JrThe journal’s editor told Reuters that it is to retract a large Denmark study that found that the aluminum component in the vaccine does not increase children’s health risks.

Kennedy has long raised doubts about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, as the health secretary recommends immunity in order to recommend the federal government. recent Media Reports He said he has been considering whether to review lenses containing aluminum, which he said is related to autoimmune diseases and allergies.

this studyFunded by the Danish government and published in the Chronicle of Internal Medicine in July, it analyses data from the national registry that provided data to 1.2 million children over a period of more than two decades. It found no evidence that exposure to aluminum in the vaccine leads to an increased risk of autoimmunity, atopy or allergic or neurodevelopmental disorders.

This work has so far been the best evidence on vaccine safety issues.

“This is solid, [a] Large amount of data sets and high-quality data. ” he said.

Kennedy described the study as a “deceptive publicity stunt show in the pharmaceutical industry” and said the scientists who wrote it “designed it to find harm” in a detailed viewpoint article on detailed trial site news on August 1, an independent website focused on clinical research. He called on the diary to “retract immediately” the study.

“I don’t think there is any reason to retreat,” Dr. Christine Ryan, a professor of medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, said in an interview.

Ryan said the criticism of the article received on its website for the news program that was not intended to respond directly to Kennedy’s work, which Kennedy did not submit to the journal.

Anders Peter Hviid, the principal author of the study and head of epidemiological research at the Statens Serum Institut, Denmark, defended the work in a response post at the trial site. He wrote that no criticism made by Kennedy was substantial, and he explicitly denied any deception that the secretary implied.

“I’m used to researching vaccine safety, especially those related to autism, but have not been the goal of becoming a politician in this way before,” Hviid said in an email response to Reuters. “I’m confident in our work and our ability to respond to research criticism.”

Kennedy has received a lot of criticism, including the lack of a control group, and the study deliberately excludes different groups of children to avoid showing a link between aluminum and children’s health – including those with the highest levels of exposure and not including the original data.

Hviid responded to criticism of the experimental site. Some of these views are related to study design choices that reasonably discuss but dismiss other studies, including the purpose of which the study was designed to not find links. He said that, in fact, its design is based on Research led by Matthew Daleya pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, did show a link that Kennedy quoted in his article.

Hviid added that there was no control group because in Denmark, only 2% of children were not vaccinated, which was too small to make a meaningful comparison. He said the data are available for analysis by researchers, but no personal-level data is released under Danish law.

Other notable vaccine skeptics, including those from Kennedy’s antibacterial tissue healthy National Defense similarly criticized the study of on-site chronicles of internal medicine.

The staff of the experimenter defended the size, data transparency and funding of the study while acknowledging the limitations of its design, a view drawn by some outside scientists.

Ryan said that while some of the questions raised by Kennedy in his articles may highlight the acceptable limitations of the study, “they do not invalidate what they find and there is no evidence of scientific misconduct.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Health and Human Services said the department “has no further comment than what the secretary said.”

Source link