veteran climate Scientists are coordinating public comments to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) report, which doubts about scientific consensus make Climate crisis.
The report, released late last month, claims concerns about the heating up of the flight Fossil fuels Exaggerated, attracted widespread attention the scientist He said it was full of climate misinformation. This is an attempt to support the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal to revoke “hazardous hazard discovery”, an exploration that forms the legal basis for nearly all U.S. climate regulations.
“Experts’ public comments may be useful because it injects expert analysis into the decision-making process that could otherwise be subject to political, economic or ideological considerations,” said Andrew Dessler, a climate researcher at Texas A&M University. “Experts can identify technical errors, highlight ignored data, and clarify uncertainty in ways that improve the accuracy and robustness of the final policy or report.”
This reaction is part of an attempt by experts to maintain established climate science as a wider wave. Trump administration Promote counter-trend and unproven perspectives.
The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) of the country’s highest scientific advisory panel conducted a “fast track” review of the latest evidence on how greenhouse gases threaten human health and health – the hazards caused by the proposed hazards.
It is recommended that the EPA and other federal agencies plan to release their findings in September and inform the EPA of its decision on hazard discovery in a timely manner. The initiative will be self-funded by the organization, a very unusual practice by congressional charter groups that often respond to calls from federal agencies.
“It is crucial that federal decisions are informed by the best scientific evidence,” Marcia McNutt, president of the National Academy of Sciences, said in a statement.
The Trump administration’s efforts to block access to data have also inspired obstacles. This month, the president ousted the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics No basis Say the data it publishes is “manipulated”.
In the early days, federal officials also deleted it Critical climate data And such as National climate assessment and US Global Change Research Program From the government website. The government has changed 70% of the official environmental website information According to a report, the report released last week, which was published 100 days before the first Trump administration.
In view of these actions, research organizations, e.g. Public environmental data project and Cornerstone Sustainability Data Program Work to protect and publicize data hidden from the federal government.
“Attacks on science are dangerous because they erode one of the most effective tools of society to understand the world and make decisions for the public good,” Dessler said. “When politics or ideology undermines scientific institutions or discredits experts, they undermine our ability to use this powerful tool.”
When asked about comments about NASEM comments, an EPA spokesperson reiterated earlier this month: “Congress has never explicitly granted EPA authorization to impose greenhouse gas regulations on cars and trucks.”
If EPA administrators determine that their emission hazards are harmful to public health or welfare, the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to set emission standards for vehicles. Due to the hazards found, these include greenhouse gas emissions.
Ask for comments on DOE reports supporting EPA positions, vitality Spokesperson Ben Dietderich also repeated earlier comments. “This report critically evaluates many areas of ongoing scientific investigation that are often assigned to a high level of confidence – not the scientists themselves, but by political institutions such as the United Nations or former presidential government,” he said.
The United Nations and the United States regularly convene top scientists to produce scientific climate reports, which warns of the need for urgent containment of emissions.
Dietderich also said officials “look forward to substantive comments in the report.”
But, “the real question is whether they will listen to us,” Desler said.
Health & Wellness Contributor
A wellness enthusiast and certified nutrition advisor, Meera covers everything from healthy living tips to medical breakthroughs. Her articles aim to inform and inspire readers to live better every day.
