In early December, Scott Answer angrily When a Fox reporter aired on a conspiracy on Trump’s election, he told another executive in an email, “this must be stopped immediately.”
“It’s not good for the business,” she added.
In other newsletters, executives said they needed to “cross the problem” and said they were wary of “pissing”[ing] audience. ”
Dominion said its attorneys sent more than 3,600 emails to FOX employees in an attempt to correct Fox’s report on this issue. The company identified 20 specific statements from FOX broadcasts between November 8, 2020 and January 26, 2021, saying it was legally defamatory.
Davis has said that the evidence in this case “suggests that the rule relating to the 2020 election is obvious.”
Regardless of the strong Dominion case, it seems, that the constitution and the Supreme Court precedent make it difficult for the news media to prove defamation. The bar is high; Dominion will need to prove “actual maliciousness”, which means Fox either knows that its broadcast is wrong or that it is recklessly ignoring the truth.
Fox’s lawyers argued in this domination that the First Amendment protected them and that the moderators simply raised the news value that others had raised – Trump and his allies.
“Dominion’s lawsuit is a political crusade seeking financial windfall, but the real cost will cherish First Amendment rights,” Fox said in a statement to the Huffpost. “While Dominion pushes irrelevant misleading information to bring headlines, Fox News remains firmly protecting the rights of the free media, but its private equity owners will have serious consequences for journalism as a whole, given the verdict on Dominion.”
The trial is expected to last for six weeks.
This is a joint version One article Originally published on Huffpost.
Health & Wellness Contributor
A wellness enthusiast and certified nutrition advisor, Meera covers everything from healthy living tips to medical breakthroughs. Her articles aim to inform and inspire readers to live better every day.
