Federal judge suspends Trump’s plan to donate to family planning

The judge on Monday temporarily stopped it Trump administration Medicaid funds for family planning were deprived of family planning after Congress and President Donald Trump agreed to pass the passage of the A Large Beauty Act.

Indira Talwani of the Massachusetts District Court said in her order that the bill partially granted the bill, which unconstitutionally punished family planning member organizations that did not provide abortion.

Talwani, who was appointed by Obama, wrote that the ban would have “the most or least the financial or other harm to the Trump administration” risks. ”

Senate Member OKS bans federal funding for planning parenting

Talwani’s order stems from a lawsuit filed by the nation’s largest abortion provider to plan parenting, a large-scale Beautiful Act, a large-scale budget bill that was passed this month by Congress without support from Democrats. Trump signed the bill into law on July 4.

A provision in the bill divested Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood, and nonprofits could force it to close 200 of its 600 facilities and deprive about half of its customers, more than a million services, including not including miscarriage.

Family Planning attorneys noted in court documents that Medicaid generally does not cover abortion.

Judge burns for family planning order: Her court looks “like a fast food round trip”

Family Planning Sign (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)

Lawyers believe cancer and sexually transmitted infections will not be detected, especially for low-income people, and more unplanned pregnancy will occur due to the lack of contraceptive measures. The consequences of losing Medicaid funds are “will be serious”, they said.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers have previously argued in court documents that the purpose of the budget provisions is to stop “federal subsidized large abortions” by freezing federal funds from certain Medicaid recipients. Abortion provided. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roev. Since Wade, vulnerable parenting for family planning has been one of the main priorities of the parenting movement.

Two weeks ago, Talwani approved a temporary restraining order to support family planning. The judge initially offered no explanation for her decision, a move that led to widespread opposition among Republicans who described it as a judicial overdo. A few days later, Talwani provided more context in the order that followed.

Family Planning Use “Loopholes” to Make Gender Changes in Minors Without Parents’ Ok: Watch Dogs

Anti-abortion activists travel through the National Mall near the U.S. Capitol at the 50th Annual Life Rally in Washington, DC on January 20, 2023. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The preliminary injunction will return family planning indefinitely, but the Trump administration may appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Justice Department lawyers have previously argued to the court that a measure that prevents Congress from passing and signed by the president is an extraordinary and unreasonable move.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“Besides the futility of the merit claim, family planning has not shown an impending irreparable harm to justify the injunction, asserting only classic classical economic harm, and has nothing to do with potential harms that are not third parties in this court,” wrote Doji’s lawyer.