Hours after Conservative activist Charlie Kirk Being shot On Wednesday, in front of a large number of students at the University of Utah, there was no news about who actually did it, and no explanation for why it happened. But in Washington, those who claim to no longer need facts: Partisans are equipped with pre-existing truths, and events are inserted into narratives that already existed before the events occur. Even before Kirk’s death, Republican Nancy Mace from South Carolina spoke with reporters outside the Capitol. “The Democrats have everything that happened today,” she told them. When NBC News’ chief Capitol correspondent Ryan Nobles asked her if the shooting of two Minnesota Democratic lawmakers would be shot this summer, she replied, “Are you kidding? … Some angry left-wing crazy lunatics put a bullet around his neck, and now you want to talk about Republicans.
It might be easier to see Messe as just playing on camera at different times, but to cheer up from the many remarks of rejecting political violence and expressing shock, terror and solidarity, and Democrats and Republicans have rolled in. Vice President JD Vance gave a heartfelt eulogy to X, saying that the thirty-one-year-old political provocateur was once his close friend and was a model of “the fundamental virtue of our republic: the willingness to speak publicly and debate ideas.” However, the inner anger caused by Metz is not an outlier. On the floor of the House, members of both sides rose from their seats as Speaker Mike Johnson called on Kirk to pray silently, while brief booing showed that at least some of the bipartisan habits of rituals remained intact. Then a shouting game broke out, Lauren BoebertA Colorado Republican called for not only a silent prayer, but various Democrats opposed the mass shootings in Colorado that day without offering prayers to students. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican of Florida, shouted to Democrats: “You all caused this.”
A few hours later, Donald Trump Respond to Kirk’s death in the four-minute Oval Office video He posted this on social media feed. There will be no lectures on “We need to lower political temperature” or “We may not agree, we are not enemies”. (This is Biden’s reality explain when Trump is being sacked By the summer of 2024, it may become an assassin’s bullet. He neither cites any evidence nor believes that any evidence is necessary. In recent years, he has not mentioned any political attacks that claim to be victims of democracy, including earlier this summer Shooting two Minnesota lawmakersone of them died.
“For years, radical leftists compared outstanding Americans like Charlie to the Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals. This remark is directly responsible for the terrorism we see in the country today and it must stop immediately,” before providing a list of victims of other “Laura Province political violence”, including myself, including myself, including myself. He promised to act quickly to reduce the perpetrators of this violence and to fund and promote its “organizations.” Trump’s significant threat has not attracted much attention to some extent. It should have. Not only is the president not trying to unite the country, but he seems to be blaming most of the country, which have reshaped his racial division policies, and Kirk promotes policies like they triggered the trigger.
Trump’s most influential allies and advisers are clarifying what this might mean, explicitly demanding a crackdown on the American left, in line with what Kirk uses as a free expression spirit, which Kirk uses as his rally cry to recruit a new generation of young conservatives. “It’s time to shut down the Trump administration, approve and prosecute every left-wing organization,” far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer successfully pushed Trump to fire many national security officials, he wrote on X. “We have to shut down these crazy leftists. Christopher Rufoanother influential Trumpist, who led the move against diversity initiatives, eventually becoming Core purpose In the second Trump administration, political convulsions were invoked Nineteen points. “The radical left orchestrated a wave of violence and terror, J. EdgarHoover shut down it all in a few years,” he wrote. “It’s time to infiltrate, destroy, arrest and imprison all those responsible for this chaos within the scope of the law.”
If any official views of such a statement are misunderstood, Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller joined from the West Wing Thursday, in a lengthy post from X to Wage Wage, killing Kirk and the death of Kirk who cheered online in a lengthy post. Miller added: “The fate of our children, our society, our civilization depends on it.” Call it, no.
Kirk’s killings fell just the day before September 11, and Trump will mark the 24th anniversary of the attack on the United States, a purely sad coincidence. The destruction of Osama bin Laden and his Islamic extremist Twin Towers led the George W. Bush administration’s “Goorge W. In his student days, Miller launched a project to warn of the threat of “Islamic Fassism” and portrayed the United States as forced to clash with radical Islamic jihadist ideology.
So how compelling it is to read Miller’s manifesto what he considers to be the main threat today, just like Trump and many of his people Magazine The current speech of the movement does not focus on external rivals such as Russia and China, but introduces the horrible prospects of internal violent enemies, “This ideology has been growing steadily in this country, an ideology that hates all goodness, justice and beauty, and celebrates all the twisted, twisted and depraved things,” Miller calls it. ”
It is fair to point out that much of Miller’s response to Kirk’s death is similar to what he might have said about Islamic terrorists decades ago, but it is not Miller’s lack of creativity, which stands out from his (better than his most important family) in that “and suffered from a ‘half-century’ attitude, which is similar to his speed and clarity, which is not his speed and clarity.
While others are praying for a rapidly escalating issue of violence throughout the political field, the president and his close advisers define the crisis differently: it’s about the rights of besieged Americans and what Trump will do. For those who choose to listen, the point here is clear: the president does not care about all those holy calls for healing. This is not a conversation about the crisis of political violence in the United States that he wants now, but a positive new political policy. ♦

Health & Wellness Contributor
A wellness enthusiast and certified nutrition advisor, Meera covers everything from healthy living tips to medical breakthroughs. Her articles aim to inform and inspire readers to live better every day.