Immigration experts warn that the U.S. Supreme Court “effectively legitimizes racial analysis.” Immigration in the United States

Immigration advocates warn Supreme Court Having a “efficient legalized race profile” that gives federal agents the right to stop people Los Angeles They say it is just to speak Spanish or to appear Latino and to open up for civil rights protection nationwide.

Conservative majority in court in Monday’s 6-3 ruling lift In the lower court found that federal agents were restricted on “patrol” immigration patrols across the Los Angeles area after vain targeting people on a federal agent in a vain manner.

High Court ruling shocked advocates of civil liberties and rattled immigrant communities One third of the residents are foreign-bornActive immigration enforcement in the Trump administration has seen armed and covered up federal agents detained in custody of residents, including U.S. citizens, near bus stops, construction sites, churches and Other public places There is little explanation or due process.

At a press conference near Home Depot in the Latino community in Los Angeles Raid June triggered Large-scale protestmayor of the city, Karen Bassattacked the decision, saying the Supreme Court “has now provided a green light for law enforcement to outline and detain Angelenoth based on their race.”

The bass quotes strong dissidents from the first Latino Sonia Sotomayor who served in court, warning: “We don’t have to live in a country where the government can grab anyone who looks like Latino, speaks Spanish and seems to work at a lower wage.

“I agree with her – I don’t,” Bass said. “We all disagree because from the very beginning, we knew Los Angeles The federal government has used it as a test case for all advantages and unrestricted powers. ”

The decision was announced by the Department of Homeland Security Start a new immigration action Monday in Chicago, as the Trump administration continues to dock immigration in Washington, D.C. An unprecedented acquisition The capital of the country.

Monday’s Supreme Court ruling stemmed from a lawsuit that challenged strategies used in a series of aggressive immigration sweeps in the Los Angeles area. The plaintiff argued that federal agents targeted people without a doubt – a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which prevented illegal searches and seizures.

In July, U.S. District Court Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong released Temporary restriction order Unless an agent blocks people based solely on four factors, individually or in combination, including race or race, speaking Spanish or stress-speaking English, in certain public areas, such as summer laborer sites or the type of work they are engaged in.

The administration celebrates the Supreme Court’s ruling as a “huge victory” for Trump’s “largest mass deportation campaign” in U.S. history.

This department Statement on X Shortly after the ruling.

In separate posts xAttorney General Pam Bondi said the ruling means immigration law enforcement officers “can continue patrolling California in California without the need for judicial micromanagement.”

The judge did not provide reasons for his orders, which became increasingly common in deciding what the court called “emergency case files.” However, in the agreed opinion, part of the conservative majority and Trump-appointed justice listed the large undocumented population in Los Angeles and wrote that race could be a “relevant factor”, along with other “common sense” indicators, as well as use in landscapes, agriculture or construction, and use in land-making, agriculture or limited proficiency, create “reasonable doubt” in the case of raising doubt.

Sotomayor said in his dissent that Kavanaugh’s description of the “wink reality”. The plaintiffs in the case included two U.S. citizens who said they were stopped and questioned.

“Now, immigration agents have obtained profiles, cessation, detention and arresting personnel due to the color of the skin, the language of speech or the work they do,” said the Los Angeles press conference. “In doing so, they effectively legalize racial analysis and extend racial discrimination.”

Several spokespersons said the ruling punished those who empowered the country and the country’s economy and warned that its impact would ripple in every sector of American life.

“California is the fourth largest economy in the world, not by chance, but by the contribution of our immigrant communities,” said Eunisses Hernandez, who represents Los Angeles City Councilman. West Lakeone neighborhood advocates say the repeated immigration raids have been traumatized. “You do not profit from our labor and then criminalize our existence.”

In a statement, the governor of California Gavin Newsomcondemning the decision: “Among the Grand Marshal of Trump’s racial terror march in Los Angeles, Trump’s Supreme Court majority.”

“Trump’s private police force now has a green light to follow your family, and everyone is a target right now,” the governor said. “But we will continue to fight these abominable attacks on Californians.”

While Monday’s decision allowed immigration agents to resume patrols based on race, it was not the final right to decide the matter. A federal judge will hold a hearing later this month on whether to relocate the case, which passes the lower court.

During the peak of the raid earlier this summer, volunteers formed community patrols to focus on the presence of federal agents, while community groups were afraid to leave their homes for immigrants to organize food delivery.

According to Flor Melendrez, executive director of the Clean Cash Workers Center, about 81 car washes and nearly 250 workers were detained, as part of a federal immigration crackdown that separates families and detains children.

“Let it be your call to action, stand with our community, stand with the workers,” Merendres said at a West Lake news conference on Monday.

Ride the podium as her longtime immigration rights activist, Angelica Salas, the head of the Los Angeles-based Humane Immigration Rights League, signaling residents to stare through the windows on the apartment building.

“They are witnesses to the witnesses,” Salas said. A young boy pressed his face against a glass above a group of radicals, holding a sign that reads “Ice Beyond the Ice” and “Ice Talk Show.”

“We will continue to fight,” she vowed. “We will continue despite the lack of protection.”