Experts condemn NIH directors’ defense of layoffs on vaccine research | American politics

When the NIH directors said this week that the funds used to develop mRNA vaccines (the backbone of the Covid vaccine) were damaged because they failed to “win public trust”, so it will be encountered publicly and privately, with angry suspicion.

Critics say few do much more than Jay Bhattacharya and other top health officials Trump administration To announce doubts about public health agencies and to expand the value of vaccines that save millions of lives in the world.

“It is shocking that Batatacharia has the courage to claim to know that the Biden-era policy is responsible for distrust of mRNA vaccines, when he and his accomplices have made great efforts to reduce appreciation of these important medical achievements,” Jeremy Berg, former director of the National School of Medicine, said at the NIH.

Bhattacharya’s comment appears in In The Washington Post He defended Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, who is anti-vaccine, to terminate $500 million in federal MRNA vaccine research funding, which Kennedy claims he “reviewed science,” which proves Kennedy’s justification. Experts say Evidence from Kennedy Review Ending the study is not supported.

While mRNA platforms are “promising” and have the potential to make breakthroughs in the treatment of cancer and other diseases, Bhattacharya said it has failed to be used in public health emergencies because it has not gained public trust.

“No matter how elegant science is, a platform that lacks credibility among those seeking protection cannot fulfill its public health mission.”

However, experts say this approach is wrong. This also seems to downplay an important point: that is, even if they do not stop the infection, i.e., even if they do not stop the symptoms and severe disease, so the common vaccine ends up successfully stopping the symptoms and severe disease.

Paul Offit Vaccine Education Center The infectious disease physician at Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia said the question is not whether the vaccines gain public trust, but whether they are effective and safe. He said the answer was “apparently yes”.

“The vaccine is not running for office. We don’t need to vote to determine whether to use it. We need to do better to explain the science that supports vaccine use.”

Batacharia’s criticism is directed at the Biden administration, and despite the development of distortion speed during the first Trump administration, the president himself was a feat as a major achievement. Bhattacharya said the Biden administration “has not managed public trust in the coronavirus vaccine” and “has not rightly recognized the growing concerns of Americans for safety and effectiveness.”

The doctors and scientists interviewed by the ward have challenged this narrative.

Jonathan Howard, a physician whose forthcoming book, All Others Are Lies You, examines how medical institutions standardize “quacks” during the Kuvid pandemic and undermine public health, said Bhattacharya was “ubiquitous” in the media, and in the early media of the pandemic published articles, it was a general objection that often limits restrictions on covid.

Bhattacharya also mistakenly stated in March 2020 that the estimated Covid mortality rate “maybe too high for orders of magnitude”.

Howard claims in his new book that the NIH head-to-on-vaccine method is to spread “false information.”

“Dr. Bhattacharya spent years deeming rare, mild temporary vaccine side effects as fate is worse than Covid’s death. 1755252255 He said that the entire field of scientific research was destroyed by the excuse of “distrust”. ” he said.

Bhattacharya claims he is a victim of censorship during the pandemic and defends what he says is against.

Joshua Weitz, Professor of Biology Among the University of Maryland and asymptomatic authors, Batacharia’s arguments fail to acknowledge the current leadership of the Department of Health and Human Services and anti-vaccine influencers in undermining public trust.

“The success of the vaccination campaign depends on the effectiveness of the vaccine’s resistance to disease and how many people are vaccinated in time,” Weitz said.

“A column seeding on the number of lives saved by federal vaccines favors a recent study that claims about 2.5 million lives were saved globally, rather than 10 million or more estimated elsewhere. Even lower estimates, an estimated 2.5 million people savings estimates of about 2.5 million people, illustrates the capacity of these vaccines that differ in size across the scale.”

NIH did not respond to a request for comment.

Bhattacharya’s column is about some experts who believe this is part of a worrying pattern that NIH has made remarks on the MRNA vaccine. Kennedy had expressed retention to mRNA vaccine technology before confirming as Secretary of Health. Once confirmed, the researchers It is reported that scrubbing references to mRNA vaccine technology From a grant application.

In May, the department Health and Public Services canceled $776 million Influenza subtypes that develop, test and license vaccines with modern contracts could trigger a future pandemic, and then Kennedy decided to reduce the decision to research and development of mRNA vaccines. This week’s column is another reason for panic.

“Worrying that this is just the tip of the iceberg,” said Jeff Kohler, professor of RNA biology and therapy at Johns Hopkins University. Kohler said he found the album both shocking and disappointing, partly because its 95% efficiency in two FDA trials is “the most convincing data in any vaccination program we use in human history is probably some of the most convincing data.”

“Can we continue to maintain the commitment to this breakthrough technology in this climate? It doesn’t take much vision to see this model that might be reflected in policy changes.”